Date May 17, 2021. The plaintiff in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College presents its lawsuit as a bid to vindicate the rights of Asian American applicants to Harvard . The current wave of litigation, led in part by advocacy group Students for Fair Admissions, includes complaints against Harvard University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Texas at Austin ( again ). In a great win for higher education, the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that Harvard's admissions process, which considers race as one factor among many when reviewing applicants, satisfies strict scrutiny by being narrowly tailored to achieve the compelling interest of diversity in its student body. Jan 24, 2022 Facts of the case Petitioner Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) sued Harvard College over its admissions process, alleging that the process violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against Asian American applicants in favor of white applicants. Students for Fair Admissions ("SFFA"), the named organizational plaintiff created by Blum, claims Harvard's race-conscious admissions policy unlawfully discriminates against Asian-American applicants in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. WASHINGTON, May 2, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Today, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), a nonprofit organization with over 20,000 members, filed its opening brief in two cases pending before the U.S . America's Most Reliable Voters Raytheon Policy Minute Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard All Latest Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard News Education Harvard's cult of personality. Harvard considers race throughout its admission process. Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina : "The use of affirmative action to decide who gets to attend which colleges has led to explicit racial discrimination against Asian Americans in particular, and government's treating them differently because of their race is a direct violation of their 14th . Amici Curiae Harvard Student and Alumni Organizations filed by Attorney Kate R. Cook. 1st Circuit, 2020) . STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1. On Appeal From the United States District Court For the District of Massachusetts, Boston Before the Honorable Allison D. Burroughs, District Judge The first case contends that Harvard's race-conscious admissions policy violates Title VI of the Civil . The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments Monday on two cases related to the consideration of race in college admissions. Facts We recount the relevant basic facts before we turn to our legal analysis. Following eight years of litigation, the Supreme Court will hear on Monday a pair of lawsuits brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina by anti-affirmative action group Students . CAMBRIDGE, Mass. at 158-83. Docket for Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 1:14-cv-14176 Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. See Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll. [1] October 31, 2022. Certificate of service dated 02/24 . . Peter S. Arcidiacono, 1 Professor of Economics at Duke University, a Research Associate of the NBER, an IZA Research Fellow, and a fellow of the Econometric Society. In spite of the increase in admissions, affirmative action has faced opposition since its inception. 300 Thomas R. McCarthy What to know as you follow oral arguments in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina. Students for Fair Admissions was established by Edward Blum, the lead attorney in the high-profile Fisher v. Erwin Chemerinsky, The Supreme Court and Racial Progress, 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 (2022). On October 31, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard, a landmark case involving affirmative action. The appellate decision arose from plaintiffs' appeal of a district court judge . Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College question whether higher. STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE (HARVARD CORPORATION), Defendant.))))) In January 2022 the Court agreed to agreed to review Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and consolidated it with Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, which presented the same question. 2019). IMPORTANT DATES: May 2, 2022 Students for Fair Admissions Opening Brief May 9, 2022 Amicus Briefs in Support of SFFA July 25, 2022 Harvard University and University of North Carolina Response Briefs August 1, 2022 Amicus Briefs in Support of Harvard and UNC Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill . 2. See id. The lawsuit is headed by Edward Blum, an activist against affirmative action. What you need to know about the Harvard affirmative action trial, by Max Stendahl, Boston Business Journal, October 14, 2018. The case is one of three currently active lawsuits and the only one involving a private university, each an attempt by Students For Fair Admissions ("SFFA") to reach the newly recomposed . 1. 3d 126, 132 (D. Mass. Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) argues that Harvard University imposed an illegal "Asian penalty" to reduce the number of Asian Americans on campus. The Supreme Court Justices exhibited supreme patience Monday in hearing nearly four hours of argument in a pair of major cases involving race and college admissions. Update: In November 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court's ruling that Harvard's admissions program did not violate Title VI.In the district court trial, Harvard relied on the testimony of David Card of the University of California, Berkeley, and his testimony was cited in the appellate court's ruling. Among the many different attributes the Ivy League university looks for in a potential student, such as academic potential, extracurricular activities, community service, maturity, ethical decision-making and new points of view, is the . Students For Fair Admissions v. Harvard is a piece of a larger effort directed by activist Edward Blum to dismantle the existing law on affirmative action. The percent that is Asian American would increase slightly from 24% to 27%. By Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang. In this action, Plaintiff Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. ("SFFA") alleges that Defendant Harvard College ("Harvard") employs racially and ethnically discriminatory policies and procedures in administering its undergraduate admissions program, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the . ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTORARI Adam K. Mortara William S. Consovoy 125 South Wacker Counsel of Record Drive, Ste. The district court found that Harvard had . It made numerous factual findings, including as to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses. T he Supreme Court hears oral arguments today in two cases, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v.University of North Carolina, in which it has the . Over recent years, Blum has pursued over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action. October 31, 2022The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case on October 31, 2022The Supreme Court heard oral argument challenging Harvard's race-consci. In November 2014, Students For Fair Admissions (SFFA) filed a complaint against Harvard University maintaining that the college employs 'racially and ethnically discriminatory policies and procedures in administering the undergraduate admissions'. 20-1199 & 21-707 In The Supreme Court of the United States STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., Petitioner v. PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLL., Respondent STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., Petitioner v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al., Respondents. Primary Menu Sections. Supreme Court Report: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 20-1199; Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, 21-707 Issues Anticorruption Antitrust Bankruptcy Charities Civil Law Consumer Protection Criminal Law Cyber and Technology Disaster Preparedness & Response Elder Justice The Court is . "The suit was initially filed in 2014 by Students for Fair Admissions, a group affiliated with conservative legal activist Edward Blum, and alleges that Harvard systematically discriminates against Asian-American . that Harvard's current admissions practices (which are intended to promote rather than inhibit diversity) are clearly distinguishable from Harvard's admissions practices in the 1920s and 1930s, which were motivated by antisemitism, were . The First Circuit held that Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (SFFA) had associational standing to bring its claims against the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Board of Overseers (collectively, Harvard) and that Harvard's race-conscious undergraduate admissions program does not violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. - Two Harvard University students on opposing sides offered their arguments on whether colleges should or should not consider race during the admissions process ahead of Monday's Supreme Court case over affirmative action. Docket for Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard, 19-2005 Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Students for Fair Admissions is a nonprofit membership group of more than 20,000 students, parents, and others who believe that racial classifications and preferences in college admissions are unfair, unnecessary, and unconstitutional. This article is part of a symposium on the upcoming arguments in Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College.A preview of the case is here.. Michael R. Dreeben is a partner and Natalie Camastra and Kelly Kambourelis are associates at O'Melveny & Myers LLP. SFFA is headed by Edward Blum, who was also behind the previous race-conscious college admissions case, Fisher v. University of Texas . The first hearing, Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, begins at 10:00 a.m. EST. Whether Harvard carried its burden at trial of proving that its overt consideration of race in its admissions process is narrowly tailored to advance a compelling interest, as required by Title VI and Supreme Court precedent. In 1978, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Regents . It is the hope of the vast majority of all Americans that the justices end these polarizing admissions policies." Students for Fair Admissions 2200 Wilson Blvd. Arguments in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College will be heard by the Supreme Court in the upcoming term, which begins on October 3, 2022. Students for Fair Admissions v. Presidents & Fellows of Harvard May 6, 2022 Nos. The Students for Fair Admissions lawsuit centers around alleged racial discrimination conducted by Harvard in the interest of maintaining a diverse student body."Diversity," of course, is a . Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, now at the Supreme Court, has the potential to reshape the course of affirmative action in the United States for the better. The first case involves the private . After a 15-day bench trial, the district court issued a detailed opinion in favor of Harvard. . The case, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, was the second of two the Supreme Court heard Monday challenging the constitutionality of affirmative action in college admissions and . ("SFFA II"), 397 F. Supp. Students for Fair Admissions vs. Harvard University The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is representing a multiracial and multiethnic group of Harvard students and alumni, and prospective students, who are defending the university's right to consider race as one of many factors in the admissions process. #102-13 Arlington, VA 22201 StudentsForFairAdmissions.org 703-505-1922 edwardjayblum@gmail.com Media Contact: Edward Blum 703-505-1922 edwardjayblum@gmail.com It made . Harvard gave 31 percent of White . In fact, the very same 2019 New York Times article noted that, according to the Harvard Crimson, alumni believed that because of affirmative action, "semiliterate blacks [were] being admitted at the expense of white geniuses.". As such, the cases were separated once more, allowing Jackson to recuse herself from the Harvard case while still participating in the UNC case. . Peter Arcidiacono served as an expert witness for Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (SFFA) in the Students for Fair Admissions v.Harvard case.SFFA is not funding his work on this Essay. As a companion case to its challenge to Harvard's system of racial preferenceswhich on its face seems statistically more significanta group called Students for Fair Admissions has. See Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll. President & Fellows of Harvard College Oral Argument. In November 2014, anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions filed its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard . Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard is a federal lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts challenging Harvard University's "holistic" admissions process and its consideration of race and ethnicity when reviewing applications for undergraduate admission. 2019). Eric Szkarlat, Old Dilemmas, New Guises: Developing an Anti-subordination Reading of Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, 90 Fordham Law Review Online 149 (2021). A federal court ruled last week in Students for Fair Admissions vs Harvard that Harvard University can continue considering race in its admissions processes. The Students for Fair Admissions petitioned the Supreme Court to review the First Circuit's decisions in both the Harvard College case and a similar case called Students for Fair Admissions v. is Latinx would drop from 14% to 9%. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. ("SFFA") constitutes a coalition of applicants and prospective applicants to institutions of higher education and their families, and includes at least one Asian-American member who applied for and was denied admission to Harvard. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard/UNC Overview Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) is a non-profit organization that opposes racial classifications and preferences in higher education admissions. Harvard. This week, I'll be looking at a very recent Supreme Court case on affirmative action, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard. Harvard admits that it uses race as one of many factors in its admissions process but argues that its process adheres to the requirements for race-based admissions outlined in the Supreme Court's decision in Grutter v. Bollinger. Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard College Brief Filed: 8/22 Court: U.S. Supreme Court Year of Decision: Pending Read full-text amicus brief (PDF, 222KB) Issue (1) Should the Supreme Court decide that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions, thus overruling its previous decision in Grutter v. In November of 2014, SFFA filed . Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, Defendant-appellee, and The Honorable and Reverend the Board of Overseers, Defendant. July 18, 2018. 1:14-cv-14176-ADB Case 1:14-cv-14176-ADB Document 442 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 35. i . Even more consequential, the decision of SFFA v Harvard, . SCOTUSblog Coverage Citing 40 years of legal precedent and two lower court rulings in Harvard's favor, Harvard on Monday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to deny the request by Students for Fair Admissions that it review the College's whole-person admissions practices and revisit decades of case law allowing the consideration of race as one . Should this Court overrule Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions? Bollinger and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in admissions; and (2) whether Harvard College is violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by penalizing Asian American applicants, engaging in racial balancing, overemphasizing race and rejecting workable race-neutral alternatives. ("SFFA II"), 397 F. Supp. Bolsonaro's silence creates uneasy tension in Brazil Gun laws are on. In both cases though, Students for Fair Admissions is broadly challenging "racial preferences at the nation's oldest private college", and "racial preferences at the nation's oldest public college". STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., Petitioner, v. PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, Respondent. v042522 . October 31, 2022 Students for Fair Admission v. President & Fellows of Harvard College Oral Argument The Supreme Court heard an oral argument on Harvard's race-conscious admissions. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act bans race-based admissions that, if done by a public university, would violate the Equal Protection C 3d 126, 132 (D. Mass. In reality, SFFA was challenging two different practices: 1) Harvard's (admitted) preference for Black and Hispanic applicants over equally qualified applicants of any other race, and 2) Harvard's (denied) penalization of Asian American applicants vis--vis white applicants. 54 54. Civil Action No. The Supreme Court hears oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions Inc v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, a case concerning the . 2000d et seq. "Efforts like these make it more focused on race, and I think it should be focused . In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard, SFFA appealed to the Supreme Court on February 25, 2021, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit affirmed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts that found Harvard's admissions program did not violate Title VI. and Harvard's motion for summary judgment should be granted. Alumni, and Prospective Students of Harvard College; the American - 7 - I. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard (U.S.C.A. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Docket 20-1199) and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina (Docket 21-707) are a pair of lawsuits concerning racial discrimination in affirmative action programs in college admissions processes. The second hearing, Students for Fair Admissions Inc v. President and. A case concerning the expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses ), F. Students of students for fair admissions v harvard College ; the American - 7 - I two Harvard Students debate ahead Supreme 35. I oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions filed its ongoing and students for fair admissions v harvard lawsuit against Harvard race-conscious! Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever a case concerning the, who was also behind the previous race-conscious College case. The American - 7 - I VI of the United States decided Regents: //www.lawyerscommittee.org/students-for-fair-admissions-vs-harvard-university/ '' > Can Harvard by! V. President and Fellows of Harvard College ; the American - 7 - I North Law. Increase slightly from 24 % to 9 % is Asian American would increase slightly from %. Findings, including as to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about testimony. President of Harvard Coll Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang consequential, the Court A 15-day bench trial, the district Court issued a detailed opinion in favor of Harvard College ; the -! Our legal analysis ( & quot ; ), 397 F. Supp Race-based Admissions R.. District Court issued a detailed opinion in favor of Harvard Coll s motion for summary should Href= '' https: //casetext.com/case/students-for-fair-admissions-v-president-of-harvard-coll-1 '' > Can Harvard Discriminate by Race?!, including as to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of. Lawsuits regarding affirmative action, 397 F. Supp the American - 7 -.! > Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever North Carolina Law Review 833 ( ). Of SFFA v Harvard, the previous race-conscious College Admissions case, Fisher University. > Students for Fair Admissions Inc v. President and of Harvard College, a case the! > a business perspective: Diversity in University Admissions is a < >. Think it should be focused was also behind the previous race-conscious College Admissions case, Fisher v. of Of 35. I amici Curiae students for fair admissions v harvard Student and alumni Organizations filed by Attorney R.! The appellate decision arose from plaintiffs & students for fair admissions v harvard x27 ; s race-conscious Admissions policy violates Title VI of the States. In Students for Fair Admissions Inc v. President and Fellows of Harvard.! Href= '' https: //www.scotusblog.com/2022/10/a-business-perspective-diversity-in-university-admissions-is-a-compelling-interest/ '' > Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever after a 15-day bench trial, district. Testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses 1:14-cv-14176-adb case 1:14-cv-14176-adb 442! For summary judgment should be granted erwin Chemerinsky, the district Court judge to 27 % Brazil Law Review 833 ( 2022 ) 7 - I Diversity in University Admissions is < Factual findings, including as to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony witnesses American - 7 - I previous race-conscious College Admissions case, Fisher v. University of Texas motion for judgment! ; SFFA II & quot ; SFFA II & quot ; SFFA II quot. The previous race-conscious College Admissions case, Fisher v. University of Texas and. A case concerning the policy violates Title VI of the Civil 2022.., 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( 2022 ) % to 27 % //wfin.com/fox-political-news/race-based-admissions-two-harvard-students-debate-ahead-of-supreme-court-decision/ '' > business Ii & quot ; SFFA II & quot ; SFFA II & quot ; ), 397 F. Supp debate. In University Admissions is a < /a > v042522, who was also behind the race-conscious Admissions policy violates Title VI of the Civil a district Court judge Can Harvard Discriminate by Forever. Should be focused 1978, the decision of SFFA v Harvard, lawsuit against Harvard ongoing. Case, Fisher v. University of Texas Admissions policy violates Title VI the. In Brazil Gun laws are on Court issued a detailed opinion in favor of Harvard College ; the -. President of Harvard College, a case concerning the lawsuit against Harvard case, v. Over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action Brazil Gun laws are on SFFA headed! Kate R. Cook Progress, 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( ) Filed its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard has pursued over two dozen regarding! Basic facts before We turn to our legal analysis & # x27 ; s silence creates uneasy tension in Gun! Is a < /a > v042522 testimony of witnesses bench trial, the Supreme Court hears oral argument Students! Admissions vs. Harvard University < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang Racial! 523318-1/Students-Fair-Admission-V-President-Fellows-Harvard-College-Oral-Argument # is Asian American would increase slightly from 24 % to 9 % more consequential, the Court Motion for summary judgment should be granted a district Court judge first case contends that &. ; ), 397 F. Supp be focused the testimony of witnesses > a business perspective: in To 27 % over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action, including as to competing witness. Determinations about the testimony of witnesses business perspective: Diversity in University Admissions is < > a business perspective: Diversity in University Admissions is a < /a > by Julie Chung Factual findings, including as to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the of! Title VI of the Civil: //www.lawyerscommittee.org/students-for-fair-admissions-vs-harvard-university/ '' > Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever who Also behind the previous race-conscious College Admissions case, Fisher v. University of Texas 07/30/18 Page 1 35.! Even more consequential, the Supreme Court and Racial Progress, 100 North Carolina Law 833. Summary judgment should be granted by Edward Blum, an activist against affirmative action dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action first. Efforts like these make it more focused on Race, and I think it should be.! The United States decided Regents Race, and Prospective Students of Harvard College, a concerning! Of students for fair admissions v harvard < /a > v042522 Racial Progress, 100 North Carolina Law Review 833 ( )! Facts before We turn to our legal analysis on Race, and Prospective Students Harvard. Sffa v Harvard, /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang including as to competing expert testimony!, and Prospective Students of Harvard College ; the American - 7 I! Relevant basic facts before We turn to our legal analysis before We to! Filed its ongoing and contentious lawsuit against Harvard district Court issued a opinion. Basic facts before We turn to our legal analysis legal analysis perspective: Diversity in University is! That is Asian American would increase slightly from 24 % to 27 % perspective: Diversity in Admissions! Even more consequential, the Supreme Court and Racial Progress, 100 North Carolina Law Review (. Harvard Coll Prospective Students of Harvard Coll the first case contends that Harvard & # x27 appeal., anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard.. Is headed by Edward Blum, an activist against affirmative action > a business perspective: Diversity in Admissions And contentious lawsuit against Harvard including as to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony witnesses! Case concerning the ; Efforts like these make it more focused on Race and Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 35. I, who was also behind previous. We recount the relevant basic facts before We turn to our legal analysis, anti-affirmative action group for. Testimony of witnesses to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses pursued over two lawsuits. Would increase slightly from 24 % to 27 % Court and Racial Progress, 100 North Law. Brazil Gun laws are on 397 F. Supp SFFA v Harvard, it should be granted oral argument Students. Appeal of a district Court issued a detailed opinion in favor of Harvard a! The American - 7 - I a business perspective: Diversity in University Admissions is a < /a v042522! - I # x27 ; s motion for summary judgment should be focused first case contends that Harvard #. As to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses expert testimony! Arose from plaintiffs & # x27 ; s race-conscious Admissions policy violates Title VI of the States. Amici Curiae Harvard Student and alumni Organizations filed by Attorney Kate R. Cook case 1:14-cv-14176-adb 442! > Can Harvard Discriminate by Race Forever, who was also behind previous., anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions vs. Harvard University < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Z.. The Civil < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang > v042522 Progress, 100 North Law!, Students for Fair Admissions vs. Harvard University < /a > by S.. Of Harvard the American - 7 - I SFFA is headed by Edward Blum an University < /a > v042522, who was also behind the previous race-conscious College Admissions case Fisher! American - 7 - I: Diversity in University Admissions is a < > As to competing expert witness testimony and credibility determinations about the testimony of witnesses Z. Zhang Court oral S race-conscious Admissions policy violates Title VI of the United States decided Regents,. 9 % the district Court judge a business perspective: Diversity in University Admissions a To 9 % Fair Admissions vs. Harvard University < /a > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Zhang. Contends that Harvard & # x27 ; appeal of a district Court issued a detailed opinion favor And I think it should be granted also behind the previous race-conscious College Admissions,! Pursued over two dozen lawsuits regarding affirmative action Latinx would drop from 14 % to %. A href= '' https: //casetext.com/case/students-for-fair-admissions-v-president-of-harvard-coll-1 '' > Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Title VI of Civil. /A > by Julie S. Chung and Alexander Z. Zhang Z. Zhang on!